6-7 March 1996, Sandton, Johannesburg, South Africa
Call Meeting to Order
Approval of Agenda
Approval of Previous Minutes (C 95,
Calgary)
President's Report
Secretary's Report
Executive Board Meeting Report
Telecommunications Project
Congress 96
Congress 98
Treasurer's Report
Technical Assembly
Activity Management Board
Technical Committees and Specialist Group Reports
Committee Reports
Affiliate Members
Future Meetings
Closing of Meeting
WHO WHAT
All Submit papers for the "35 Years if IFIP" book to Zemanek by
May 15, 1996
All Consider appropriate action in response to the seven items listed
in section 5 of the Presidents' report to Council
President Talk to the Greek Computer Society about its dues and Membership
President Decide which Members to approach to seek invitations to host
Council or GA meetings with possible financial support from IFIP
President Establish a Task Group (of two or three Trustees and two TC Chairs)
to consider the structural implications of a large increase (eg to 25)
in the number of TCs. Produce a paper for next GA.
President, Identify next opportunity to apply for Membership of ICSU and
Brauer, submit application
Nedkov
President, Consult Member Societies inviting suggestions about how IFIP
MC could improve its services to its Members
President Consider the possibility of taking part in the UNESCO Second Intl.
TC 3 Chair Conference on Education & Informatics in Moscow, July 1-5, 1996
Brauer Meet ICSU representatives re IUCSI
Treasurer Investigate discrepancy in the grants and loans situation for three
TC5 events
Treasurer Transfer CHF 25K from Secretariat budget to President's reserve
and CHF 200K from the bank account to our investment portfolio
Treasurer Clarify the situation regarding the payment of a sponsorship fee
for a WG workshop
TC Chairs Submit event approval forms as early as possible for inclusion in
the event database to ensure it is comprehensive
TC Chairs Invite the GA representative from the host country to attend each
TC meeting
TC Chairs Consider how to improve contact with IFIP Members by
identifying and establishing links with appropriate specialist
groups in member societies.
TC Chairs Identify any countries represented in WGs who are not yet
Members and who could be encouraged to apply for Membership.
Inform the President
TC Chairs Consider names to be submitted to GA by the Internal Award
Committee for the Outstanding Service Award
TC Chairs Continue to weed out unproductive members of TCs and seek active
contributors from more Members
TC11 Chair Consult with the WG11.6 Chair about his future plans and, in case
it is necessary, consider possible successors
TC12 Chair Strengthen cooperation between IFIP and other organizations in the
field of A.I. and stimulate cooperation between TC12 and other TCs
TC12 Chair Investigate the possibility of hosting an IFIP Council or GA
meeting in Italy, possibly in conjunction with lectures or
seminars by IFIP participants aimed at raising funds
Hoerbst, Tell the Chair of the Teleteaching element of Congress 96
Gupta, of the urgent need for information so that Member Societies
(Goldsworthy)can prepare to participate
TA Produce new Guidelines for Review Committees for approval in
Canberra
AMB Prepare a standard letter about IFIP event approval guidelines
PC incl. information concerning publication procedures to
be sent to all event organizers along with external and internal
event approval sheets
MC Prepare an IFIP marketing strategy and plan for consideration
by GA, possibly with the assistance of a consultant
DCSC In order to determine the scope of IFIP's Electronic
Communication Project for developing countries, send a
questionnaire to appropriate Members seeking information
about their communication and mail facilities
DCSC Identify member societies from developing countries who
would be interested in receiving complimentary copies of
IFIP publications
PC, MC Review pattern and timing of meeting for GA
Guy, Sec. Arrange for IFIP representation in the CSSA Exhibit during
the May 96 G7 Summit meeting in South Africa
IAC Consider possible changes in the conditions governing the
Silver Core Award
SBC Draft changes to S+B to abolish cognizant officers
Nedkov Ask UNESCO if they will consider helping developing
countries to meet IFIP's Membership dues
Secretariat Consider inviting Central European non-Members to attend the
Council meeting in Slovakia in 1997
IFIP Council, 6-7 March 1996, Sandton,
Johannesburg, South Africa
Council Members Present
K. Bauknecht President A. Rolstadås Past-President W. Brauer Vice-President G. Fairall Vice-President H. Funk Vice-President A. Goldsworthy Vice-President G. Morris Secretary A. Melbye Treasurer P. Glenn Trustee W. Grafendorfer Trustee C. Guy Trustee R. Johnson Trustee D. Khakhar Trustee M. Ozeki Trustee
TC/SG Chairs Present
R. Kurki-Suonio TC 2 P. Bollerslev TC 3 P. Jaervinen TC 9 E. Hoerbst TC 10 B. von Solms TC 11 L. Carlucci-Aiello TC 12 J. Hammond TC 13 J. Gruska SG 14
Committee Chairmen/Officers Present
P. Gupta Congress 96 PC Co-Chair J. Rosenfeld IFIP Newsletter Editor M. Tienari TA Chair
Observers Present
J. Navez DCSC and FC Member R. Reis MC Member H. Zemanek Honorary Member, IFIP Historian M. Hammond Chapman & Hall S. Hodgson Chapman & Hall N. Goto Assistant to M. Ozeki
IFIP Secretariat
P. Nedkov AM, CO and UNESCO Liaison D. Hayden Administrative Assistant
Apologies for absence from Council Members
D. Dolan Trustee M. Gottlieb Trustee, DCSC Chair
Apologies for absence from TC Chairs
T. Mikami TC 5 O. Spaniol TC 6 P. Kall TC 7 B. Glasson TC 8
IFIP Council, 6-7 March 1996, Sandton,
Johannesburg, South Africa
The President opened the Council
Meeting and greeted all participants. He expressed sincere thanks
to the Host Society, Computer Society of South Africa - CSSA, for
hosting the Council and Related Meetings with very good
facilities. He introduced Mr. Simon Reynolds, President of CSSA.
Mr. Reynolds cordially welcomed everyone
to South Africa and thanked IFIP for having taken the decision to
hold the Council and Related Meetings in Johannesburg. In May
1996, a G7 international conference would convene in South Africa
and the country is becoming part of the international community
and therefore, it relies on organizations such as IFIP. Part of
its economy is highly technologically advanced. At the same time,
a large part of the society has little appreciation of IT. The
problems of transition call for a stronger interaction between
government, industry and IT practitioners of whom approximately
10% are members of CSSA. CSSA is dedicated to an "Open
Doors" policy so as to promote the understanding and use of
computers. In this respect, CSSA's cooperation with IFIP could
positively enhance a better understanding of the benefits of
advanced IT applications.
The President mentioned how
impressed he was by the different aspects of the country and
stressed IFIP's dedication to cooperate with and assist CSSA.
IFIP is an open organization and is building its communications
center in Laxenburg so as to provide further services to its
members. He recalled that 25 years ago in Ljubljana the IT
professionals of South Africa became a part of the IFIP community
and congratulated Mr. Reynolds on this occasion.
Mr. Guy recalled that the preparations
for a Council meeting begin years in advance. There were some
organizational difficulties, however, in the last few weeks the
problems were resolved and he is happy to announce that all the
necessary facilities and support were provided for the Council
and Related Meetings.
The Secretary announced Council
attendance and received apologies for absence (please refer to
the Attendance List).
Council unanimously ADOPTED the Agenda.
Council unanimously APPROVED the
Minutes.
The President referred to his
written report and stressed that IFIP is growing into an
interactive system. Maintaining an open and interactive system
has many implications and challenges, however. It is vital for
IFIP to be proactive to global political, social and economic
developments and maintain partnerships with other
intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations.
IFIP is its member societies and it should keep
clear recognition of this fact. These societies have different
cultural backgrounds and represent different levels of
technological development and an important objective would be to
define those activities and projects which are of direct or
potential interest to its members. One such area is the access to
information and developing communication capacity. Since GA 95,
IFIP has gone a long way in providing better services to its
members by establishing new communication and information
channels via the Internet and WWW. Many new list servers and home
pages were created giving greater transparency and access to IFIP
products; and the ability to influence the IFIP decision making
process in positive.
The President pointed out that
IFIP is in a healthy financial condition and that there is a
positive development in the performance of most IFIP Technical
Committees. Preparations for the IFIP WCC 96 in Canberra are
making good progress.
The results of the mail ballot for the site of
WCC 2000 were announced in mid-January and Beijing, China was
chosen to be the site of this IFIP Congress. This would be the
first IFIP Congress and General Assembly in China which is
regarded as a determination of the GA to widen the geographical
outreach of IFIP's activities, and also to encourage a stronger
involvement of the Chinese IP community in IFIP activities.
The transfer from Geneva to Laxenburg is
accomplished and the Secretariat is in full operation. This was
only possible due to the tremendous efforts of many individuals
and IFIP is grateful to Mr. A. Melbye, Mr. G. Morris, Mme. G.
Roberts and Mr. P. Nedkov for their dedication and contributions.
The President expressed his happiness that Ms. Dorothy Hayden has
joined the Secretariat and his conviction that the Laxenburg
office is able and willing to serve the various needs of IFIP as
a focal point of an open, responsive and productive IFIP
community.
In outlining the future challenges, Mr.
Bauknecht stressed the following:
The President's report was well received by
Council and its members were requested to consider appropriate
action in response to the above listed seven items.
Mr. Morris drew attention to his report and pointed out that Brazil is formally recognized as a Full Member as it paid now its 1995 dues. Armenia has paid all but a marginal amount of its 1995 dues and, in order to fulfill the formal criteria for admission, has to be represented at a future GA or Council meeting. The Academy of Sciences of Belarus has informed that severe financial constraints have made it impossible for them to pay their dues. The Secretary invited the Admissions Committee to consider recommending to GA an extended period during which the election of Belarus to Membership remains valid. Albania, Ireland, Nigeria and Tunisia have lost their voting rights since they have not paid their 1995 dues and Greece faces potential expulsion as the last payment of dues was for 1992. There are currently no formal applications for admission.
The President advised that
he intends to contact the Greek Computer Society with regard to
the dues situation. Mr. Rosenfeld queried whether IFIP
officials should investigate possibilities of alternative members
from countries which are already represented in IFIP. Mr.
Johnson inquired about the status of the 1995 dues payment of
Spain and Mr. Nedkov responded that the dues were paid
prior to the Council meeting.
The Secretary was very pleased to
report that the IFIP Secretariat in Laxenburg is a full
operational unit. For a substantial period of time the
Secretariat was under-resourced, however, following Calgary Ms.
Hayden joined IFIP, settled in quickly and is now contributing
very well to IFIP's administrative work.
Mr. Morris expressed his belief that the
many IFIP people who were in contact with the Secretariat are now
very satisfied with its performance and the services it provides.
It is important to recognize that the achievement in Laxenburg is
not just replicating the procedures previously used in Geneva.
There is a major development of IFIP's electronic communications
and on-line information network via the IFIP WWW pages and list
servers and this is a major contribution to IFIP's corporate
effectiveness.
The President informed that the
EB discussed ICSU's initiative to establish a Union of Computing
Science and Informatics. The President and Mr. Brauer intend to
meet in June 1996 with the Chairman of the Initiative Group, Mr.
Leiton. IFIP's strategy would be to join forces in the field of
scientific activities.
Mr. Gruska stressed that such a meeting
should be well prepared and IFIP technical committees should be
informed of the outcome. Mr. Brauer responded that all
concerned TC Chairs are informed of the developments. Mr.
Rosenfeld expressed his surprise that ICSU did not consult
with IFIP before this initiative was launched. Mr. Gupta
offered to contact the former President of ICSU, Mr. Menon, who
is also one of the founders of the Computer Society of India.
Mr. Goldsworthy considered that IFIP
should adopt a more formal approach to ICSU and moved that IFIP
files a formal application for scientific membership with ICSU at
the next possible opportunity.
Motion Carried.
The President informed that four
applications were submitted for the 1996 Auerbach Award. EB also
reviewed the arrangements for the Opening Ceremony of WCC'96.
Mr. Morris advised that at the
forthcoming GA in Canberra, the posts of Secretary and Treasurer
are open for election, Vice-President Fairall is eligible for
re-election and so are Cognizant Officers Ozeki and Khakhar.
The Secretary informed Council that the
Silver Core Award and the acceptability of e-mail voting was
considered by EB and advised that various other matters,
discussed by EB, would be addressed during the course of the
Council meeting under the appropriate agenda items.
Mr. Nedkov referred to his report and
informed Council that in October 1995, the IFIP President took
the initiative to form a Steering Committee with the aim to
prepare and submit to the Austrian Federal Ministry for Science,
Research and the Arts (BMWFK) a project proposal with a working
title "IFIP Communications Infrastructure". A sub-group
was set-up to prepare the project proposal, which was submitted
in early December.
The project aims to provide an easy to use
communications infrastructure. The prime needs to be addressed
would be those of the IFIP Secretariat and the IFIP network of
member societies, technical committees and working groups. The
project will concentrate on the following two general areas:
A. Development of a Hierarchical and Secure
Document Distribution Infrastructure
This part of the project work would be targeted
at developing a database environment for supporting the
administration of IFIP's Secretariat in Laxenburg. The databases
will then serve as information sources for construction and
maintenance of IFIP's Internet services. They will also assist
IFIP's internal communication by means of a secure document
distribution infrastructure. A multilevel approach would be
initiated, so that information can be sent out and retrieved
using appropriate technology, from WWW at the top level, file
transfer and electronic mail at an intermediate level, down to
fax and traditional paper mail. The system would be open for
embedding specific needs of technical committees and working
groups.
B. Multi-Technology Electronic Conferencing
After IFIP's immediate demands are met, a
second phase should be aimed at developing a modern
Multi-Technology Electronic Conferencing system, a cornerstone of
which will be document management. Apart from managing multimedia
documents, user administration will be an essential issue so as
to guarantee the necessary security and privacy.
IFIP is assured that the Ministry would fund
the project with ATS 600,000. In operational terms, the project
work started soon after the GA meeting in Calgary and the
following facilities are already available:
Mail Servers: for GA, Council, EB, Publications Committee, Activity Management Board, IFIP Member Society Editors and the Project Steering Committee. The Secretariat also has access to mail servers of several TCs and Working groups.
WWW: the homepages of IFIP are developed and links are established to member societies, TCs and WGs homepages. The Bulletin, Newsletter, IFIP Publications with C & H and various other important IFIP information materials are available on-line.
Databases: the IFIP Address and Events
Databases.
Mr. Goldsworthy reported that there had
been a wide distribution of Congress promotional material to all
persons listed in the IFIP Bulletin, to many journals and the
media at large. All members of the ACS (15 K persons) were on the
mailing list. Articles have appeared in the IFIP Newsletter;
travel agencies were advised to prepare and promote package deals
and Congress information is available via the WWW.
The Congress budget is based on 750 attendees,
while the break-even number of participants is 500. This is due
to the fact that the Organizing Committee was successful in
identifying sponsors. Two thirds of the exhibition place is
already sold. The main activity remains to publicize the 14th
World Computer Congress.
Mr. Funk announced that FOCUS was
instrumental in launching a US travel grant program. Mr.
Brauer informed that the GI has offered a prize to its
new members and the winner would receive a free air-fare to
Australia.
With regard to sponsorship and exhibitors, Mr.
Goldsworthy informed that by now there are 160 exhibitors and
the Organizers are assured of 175 K Australian Dollars in
sponsorship funds.
Mr. Gupta reported that the financial
base of Congress 96 is good and this will allow IPC to extend
support to more invited speakers. He congratulated Mr. Hoerbst on
his efforts in providing a smooth and efficient operation of the
IPC.
Mr. Hoerbst informed Council that five
Keynote Speakers are envisaged. Six Tutorials (Workshops) are
planned and will be held consecutively in Melbourne and Sydney on
30 and 31 August.
The Teleteaching Conference, chaired by Prof.
S. Wills will be attended by groups of teachers in Canberra and
many activities around the world would attract virtual
participants internationally. The Conference on Advanced IT
tools, co-chaired by Dr. N. Terashima and Dr. E. Altman,
envisages 23 invited and 25 regular presentations. 149 regular
abstracts were submitted. For the Mobile Communications
Conference, chaired by Prof. J. Encarnacao, there are 50
submitted papers. 15 invited papers are planned out of a total of
40-45 which will be delivered at the conference.
Common events include a Panel on the future of
Internet and a Pioneer's Day.
Mr. Funk noted that very few papers have
been submitted from the USA and that the reasons should be
analyzed. With reference to the submitted abstracts for Advanced
IT Tools, Mr. Rosenfeld considered IFIP should adopt
higher standards in determining what papers should be accepted. Mr.
Hoerbst responded that a uniform selection procedure does not
exist.
Messrs. Guy and Fairall expressed
some concern that very little is reported about the organization
of the WCC 96 educational component. Video conferences, on-line
and satellite links are being organized. However, many countries,
including South Africa and Zimbabwe, are not aware of any
details. Since the organization of national events involves
preliminary preparations, South Africa and Zimbabwe would
appreciate to receive more information. Messrs. Rolstadås and
Brauer explained that contacts are not maintained with Member
Societies as TC 3 members form their own groups which in
many countries do not necessarily cooperate with IFIP Member
Societies.
Mr. Bollerslev informed that an IFIP
working conference on Collaborative Learning and Working with
Telematics is planned in Vienna and Prague as a satellite event
to Teleteaching 96. He will contact Mrs. Wills for more
information. Mr. Goldsworthy recalled that the WCCE in
Australia was a very successful event and Mrs. Wills was a key
player.
The President thanked the IPC Co-chairs
for their reports and requested them to convey to the Chair of
the Teleteaching element of Congress 96 that there is an urgent
need for information so that Member Societies can prepare to
participate.
Mr. Grafendorfer informed Council that a
proposal is made to hold WCC 98 under a general theme "The
Global Information Society on the Way to the 3rd
Millennium". The Congress will consist of 6 parallel
conferences and congresses with their own program committees.
They will follow the same integrated schedule and will be
subordinated to the International Program Committee for WCC 98.
Cross committees would be established so as to coordinate the
technical and social links of Congress activities.
The WCC 98 Organizing Committee, co-chaired by
Mr. W. Grafendorfer and Mrs. M. Toth, holds regular meetings. It
relies on the assistance of IFIP member societies in marketing
the Congress world-wide. Marketing activities include the
possibility of issuing special stamps by the post offices of
Austria and Hungary. A detailed marketing strategy would be
developed. The first announcement of WCC 98 would be ready for
distribution in September 1996.
Mr. Rosenfeld inquired about the release
of a Call for Papers. Mr. Grafendorfer responded that
there could be a negative effect if Calls for Papers are not
well-timed and go out too early and that question should be
considered by the IPC. Mr. Reis advised that the
organizers should attempt to have on-line Congress information
over the Internet. Mr. von Solms recalled that the
Congress move from Vienna to Budapest should be well planned and
inquired whether associated travel costs are incorporated in the
registration fee. Mr. Grafendorfer confirmed.
The President closed the debate by
wishing success to WCC 98 in Vienna and Budapest.
Mr. Melbye referred to his report and
was pleased to inform Council that 1995 was an important and
satisfactory year for IFIP as the financial outcome is a surplus
of CHF 159.565 against a budgeted deficit of CHF 100.000.
Expenses declined significantly from the 1994 level while income
increased. Consequently, IFIP's funds increased and they reached
a level of almost CHF 1,5 M by the end of 1995 and thus the IFIP
financial foundation was significantly consolidated.
The total income of CHF 606 K was 24% above the
budget and 18% over the 1994 level, mainly due to an increase in
proceeds from activities, an improvement in Return on Assets and
an increase in Dues from Members (partially offset by an increase
in dubious or lost dues). The recorded increase in royalties from
Publications actually conceals a decline in the level of royalty
income as the change from Elsevier to Chapman & Hall was
associated with a change in accounting practice. While Elsevier
reported royalty earnings once a year, Chapman & Hall reports
twice a year and the CHF 158 K for 1995 includes not only
royalties from Elsevier sales for 1994 but also royalties from
Chapman & Hall sales during the first half of 1995.
Fortunately, from provisional reports there is a clear increasing
trend in Chapman & Hall royalties during the second half of
1995.
Total expenses of CHF 447 K were 24% below budget and 22% under the 1994 level. The most important reason for this is a substantial reduction in the administrative expenses of the IFIP Secretariat from CHF 392 K in 1994 to CHF 292 K in 1995. The 1995 expenses of the Geneva Secretariat totalled CHF 83 K, or CHF 33 K over budget, while the expenses of the Laxenburg Secretariat for the entire 1995 were remarkably low (CHF 210 K) and fortunately more than compensated the overspending in Geneva. A dramatic reduction in the communication expenses was achieved by the Laxenburg Secretariat as a result of the highly intensified use of electronic communications. Staff expenses in Laxenburg were 20% lower than budgeted, mainly caused by lack of an Administrative Assistant for a period of 4 months.
Expenses for Administrative Support were 28%
below budget and 18% lower than in 1994. TC Expenses were at the
same level as in 1994 and Technical Support expenses were CHF 30
K and only related to AMB and DCSC.
The Treasurer informed that the Final
Result, after Special Funds Provision of CHF 71 K, is an increase
in the General Fund by CHF 88 K, or 8 %, to CHF 1,125 K. This
equals 2,5 times the actual expense level in 1995 and is well
above the established target of 2,0.
With regard to the 1996 outlook, Mr. Melbye recalled
that the adopted GA 95 budget for 1996 implies a deficit of CHF
25 K. In view of the 1995 expenses levels, the Treasurer
suggested that a revision should be considered and moved that the
1996 budget of the IFIP Secretariat is reduced by CHF 25 K and
the President's Reserve Account increased with the same amount.
Motion unanimously Carried.
Referring to the Standing Order that 30% of
annual expenses should be covered by cash, the Treasurer moved
that CHF 200 K are transferred from IFIP's bank accounts to its
Portfolio Investment.
Motion unanimously Carried.
The President thanked the Treasurer for
his report. With regard to the Secretariat's expenses, he said
that IFIP should be very happy for the significant reduction due
to extremely low communication costs, good management, salary
savings over a period of 4 months, donations and other. In
future, if we wish to extend our services we cannot expect the
same reductions as there would be projects involving the IFIP
Secretariat and costs would rise. We need to be open to
adaptations and ensure sufficient resources for the Secretariat.
Mr. Tienari drew attention to his report
and the various issues that were discussed during the TA meeting.
Following a criticism relating to overlap between TA and GA, the
TA agenda was restructured and it is envisaged to use the same
format in future.
TC 2 intends to strengthen its contacts with
industry and is looking forward to attracting new members from
the field. TC 3 is considering forming a new group in educational
management. TC 8 will organize a SWOT analysis of its operations
during its next annual meeting and TC 10 is aiming to renew its
WG 10.6 on Neural Computer Systems.
With regard to the organization of virtual
conferences, TA recommends that IFIP should consider new forms of
conferencing, including via the Internet.
The new Aims and Scope of WG 5.8 on Product
Specification and Product Documentation were approved by TA.
The current IFIP TC Review Guidelines
(Supplement 6 of the IFIP Standing Orders) were discussed and
improved. These Guidelines will be re-examined during the next
meeting of TA before presenting the revised form for approval by
EB.
The following TC Review Committees were
appointed:
TC 7 Glenn, Kall, Thoft-Christensen
TC 8 Khakhar, Glasson, Davies
TC 9 Grafendorfer, Jaervinen, Brunnstein
TC 11 Guy, von Solms
TC 13 Dolan, Hammond, Shackel
The TC 12 review is postponed.
With regard to Strategic Issues, Mr. Tienari
informed that measures to ensure a proper quality of IFIP
events were further considered. IFIP should attempt to enhance
its presence outside Europe and to maintain a regional balance.
The technical committee structure should be re-examined, renewed
and consolidated. New issues for discussion during the next TA
meeting include management of technical work which extends beyond
the scope of one TC, new areas for technical activities,
cooperation with external organizations, convergence of
telecommunication and information technology, and other.
Referring to strategic issues, Mr.
Goldsworthy urged the President to send a letter to member
societies inviting feed-back on IFIP performance criteria , which
activities they consider important and how IFIP could improve its
services in future. Mr. Goldsworthy moved that a scenario
be examined how IFIP could effectively manage 25 TCs. Further, he
proposed that Council recommends GA to abolish the category of
Cognizant Officers since this interface is no longer necessary.
Following a lengthy discussion, Council Decided
the following:
Mrs. Glenn informed that the Task Force
on Harmonization and Acceptance of International Standards for IT
Professionals is planning to organize a working session on 5
September 1996 (Thursday) as part of the WCC 96 activities in
Canberra. All GA members would be invited to attend, as well as
representatives of embassies and High Commissions. It is hoped
that 50-60 participants would take part. Mr. Brauer
advised that the stress of this workshop should be laid on
harmonization of standards and not on standardization.
Mr. Grafendorfer referred to the AMB
report and advised Council that the Event Approval Guidelines are
in a process of revision. The objective is to incorporate the
current requirements for events management and to give clear and
simple instructions to conference organizers. The guidelines
would be circulated to GA members, TC and WG Chairs with a
requirement that they apply to all IFIP sponsored and
co-sponsored events and that organizers would not be allowed to
use the IFIP logo unless they accept the provisions. A standard
letter concerning publications arrangements would be sent out to
conference organizers as an attachment to the Internal and
External Event Approval Forms. It is also intended to provide
these documents electronically.
Mr. Grafendorfer informed that he has
visited the Secretariat on a number of occasions so as to discuss
events management and the introduction and operation of the new
Events Database which was converted to Microsoft Access. There
are many useful features which would be further developed so as
to more fully respond to the various IFIP needs.
In analyzing the event statistics, the AMB
Chair informed Council of a decrease of 21 % in the number of
IFIP sponsored events in 1995, as compared to the previous year.
For the same period, full and main sponsored events decreased by
26 %. One reason is that not all events were submitted for
recording. Fortunately, event proceeds increased from CHF 67 K in
1994 to CHF 94 K in 1995, or approx. 40%. In future, AMB would
consider a mechanism for invoicing event organizers for
sponsorship fees.
The President encouraged TC Chairs to
take appropriate measures so as to ensure that event forms are
submitted on a regular basis.
Mr. Kurki-Suonio pointed out that the
next TC 2 Meeting will be in Oxford, England on 13-14 July 1996.
Currently, TC 2 does not have members from Canada and Poland and
there is no contact with the representatives of Italy, Australia,
China, South Africa and Tunisia. The activity level is
satisfactory and most working groups hold one event per year.
With regard to conference proceeds, the TC 2 Chair
informed that working groups do not feel to be in a business of
making money.
Mr. Rosenfeld drew attention to the fact
that TCs could apply for DCSC funds when organizing events in
developing countries.
Mr. Bollerslev reported that the next TC
3 Annual Meeting is scheduled for 1-2 September 1996 in
Wollogong, Australia. Since 1 January 96, WG 3.2 and 3.5 have new
Chairs. TC 3 is involved with the preparations of WCC 96 and the
TC 3 Chair is happy to see that Council is enthusiastic about the
educational component.
A financial report for WCCE 95 is in
preparation by the local organizers. Preparations for WCCE 2001
in Copenhagen are under way and the organizers are attempting to
identify potential sponsors. The activity level of most working
groups is high, however, some events do not have allocated
reference numbers as not all information concerning their
organization is clear. The TC Chair has urged that event request
forms are submitted to the IFIP Secretariat.
Mr. Bollerslev expressed his
satisfaction with the developing IFIP TC 3 - UNESCO cooperation
(please refer to item 3.14.5). Finally, a concern was voiced that
Council and GA members have not been instrumental in convincing
member societies to appoint members to TC 3.
Mr. Rolstadås reported on behalf of the
TC 5 Chair, Mr. Mikami and informed Council that the next TC 5
Meeting will be held in Trondheim, Norway on 10 May 1996. There
are new TC 5 members from Germany, Slovakia, USA and Singapore
while inactive members from Canada, Argentina and Bulgaria were
dismissed. Two regional vice-chairs were appointed, as well as a
new chair of WG 5.8.
WG 5.8 is revitalized and the establishment of
WG 5.12 is in process. Other working groups have a satisfactory
level of activities.
The problem with the Journal on Computers and
Industry remains and this would be discussed during the next TC 5
meeting. TC 5 has held several successful events and greatly
contributes to IFIP royalties from publications. A major future
event is the organization of CAPE 97 in the USA in November,
1997. CAPE 2000 would be hosted by Singapore.
Mr. Rosenfeld inquired how important is
the Journal on Computers and Industry to TC 5 and what is the
reason for the decrease in TC 5 events. Mr. Rolstadås
mentioned that a special column is reserved for the TC 5 Chair
and information is provided with regard to TC 5 activities. Some
papers from TC 5 events are also included. The IFIP logo is no
longer displayed so Computers and Industry is no longer
considered to be an IFIP journal. IFIP would be in a weak
position to retain its rights over the Journal. As to the number
of events, one reason is that the market for conferences is going
down.
Mr. Khakhar reported on behalf of the TC
6 Chair, Mr. Spaniol. The next TC 6 meetings are planned to be
held in Montreal, Canada (26-27 April 1996) and in Harare,
Zimbabwe (mid October 1996). New members of TC 6 were nominated
from the Czech Republic, Hungary, Malaysia, the Netherlands and
Spain.
Most working groups maintain a high level of
activities. TC 6 recognizes that WG 6.5 has had a glorious
history and has fulfilled the goals and expectations included in
its aims and scope. At the next TC 6 meeting, the dissolution of
WG 6.5 and the creation of new task groups would be discussed. TC
6 proposes the transfer of the task group on Intelligent Networks
and the task group on Wireless Communications into working
groups. A new initiative in the field of communication systems
for developing countries is launched and this activity would
start as a task group.
TC 6 is a main contributor to IFIP events
proceeds and royalties; it organizes many successful conferences
leading to publications. Some difficulties relating to
sponsorship fees and publications were experienced. No agreement
was reached with Chapman & Hall for the electronic
publication of the First Virtual conference.
The President mentioned that TC 6 has a
good experience in interacting with other organizations. Mr.
Khakhar agreed that good examples are the preparations and
organization of AFRICOM 96 and SEACOMM 96. There is no
competition with ICCC as TC 6 concentrates on technical aspects,
and ICCC on applications.
Mr. Johnson asserted the importance of
creating an IFIP archive of papers and, with regard to 1st
Virtual, he persisted with the matter so as to obtain copyright.
IFIP should be more active in organizing different new forms of
conferencing and PC would prepare a proposal concerning virtual
conferences for GA discussion.
Mrs. Glenn referred to the report of the
TC 7 Chair, Mr. Kall and said that the TC consists of 29 full
members and 6 WG Chairs. The next TC 7 meeting is scheduled for
June 1996. Roughly 40 % of the members are inactive and
attempts are made to involve IFIP GA members in nominating
representatives to TC 7. Since Calgary, two working groups have
held events. Further events are envisaged in the course of 1996.
TC 7 plans to revise its Aims and Scope, and so do 4 of the 7
working groups.
Some publication problems were experienced with
Chapman & Hall in bulk sales for smaller and specialized
events.
Mr. Khakhar reported on behalf of the TC
8 Chair, Mr. Glasson. The last TC 8 meeting was held in August
1995 in Trondheim, Norway and was attended by 15 national
representatives and all six working group Chairs. The next
business meeting is scheduled for April 1996 in Arizona. Working
groups have several events scheduled for 1996 and beyond and
there are plans for an active participation in WCC 98. Currently,
electronic mailing lists are being compiled so as to facilitate
communications.
Mr. Jaervinen drew attention to his
report and informed Council that the next Annual meeting is
scheduled for 16-17 March 1996 in Tel Aviv, Israel. Australia has
a new representative and other member societies are requested to
consider nominating members to TC 9. Working groups 9.1, 9.3, 9.4
and 9.5 have new Chairs.
The general level of activity of TC 9 and its
working groups is considered to be good with the organization of
a number of events in the pipe-line. A successful Newsletter is
published by the group on Social Implications of Computers in
Developing Countries and the 3rd Namur Award was given
in January 96 to ALTERNEX. TC 9 and its working groups look
forward to actively supporting WCC 98.
Mr. Hoerbst referred to his report and
mentioned that out of the 17 planned events only 3 are recorded
by AMB. This is mainly due to a 100% change in working group
chairmanship. More TC 10 event requests would be submitted in due
course.
The next TC 10 meeting is scheduled for
September 1996 in Canberra, Australia. Apart from WG 10.6, all
working groups are in good shape. New members, in accord with
Bylaw 4.3.2 cat. B, are representatives from the UK and France.
There are some problems with inactive members from Eastern Europe
and China. The financial situation of TC 10 is very satisfactory
and working groups 10.5 and 10.7 maintain their own WWW pages.
Mr. von Solms reported that valuable
information concerning TC 11 and its activities can be found on
the WWW homepages, maintained by the TC 11 Vice-Chair in Austria.
The main thrust in TC 11 activities is geared
towards the preparation and organization of IFIP/SEC 96, 21-24
May 1996, Samos, Greece. Most working groups are heavily involved
with the organization of this event and would also hold related
events and meetings. The Conference registration fee is USD 450.
China invited IFIP to host IFIP/SEC 2000 but so far there is
little communication on the subject. TC 11 agreed to hold SEC
2000 as a related event to WCC 2000.
In the Information Security field many
competitive conferences are organized. One such area is medical
informatics security and TC 11 is looking forward to a closer
cooperation with IMIA. TC 11 is working hard to create regional
and local groups and in such cases it is hard to adopt the IFIP
sponsorship scheme in organizing smaller events. There is however
sense in requesting proceeds from larger conferences.
Mr. Melbye recalled that fees are
normally not requested for workshops. Sponsorship fees should be
regarded as a way to raise funds for other IFIP activities,
including grants.
Mrs. Carlucci-Aiello recalled that she
has little experience as TC 12 Chair as she entered office in
January 1996. The TC 12 Secretary was re-appointed and the TC
Chair is attempting to identify one or two Vice-Chairs. The next
meeting of TC 12 is scheduled for June 1996 in Bonn, Germany.
Following Calgary, there is little to report on
activities. The main challenge now is to assess the state of its
working groups and then to proceed further in strengthening
cooperation between IFIP and other organizations in the field of
Artificial Intelligence. Mrs. Carlucci-Aiello requested
other TC Chairs and IFIP as a whole to help TC 12 in making
further progress.
Mr. Rosenfeld inquired how healthy TC 12
is and what would become of it in future. The TC Chair responded
that TC 12 is in a very weak position and she accepted to chair
the committee, following serious considerations. There is room
for developing future activities and she could only promise to do
her best.
Mrs. Hammond reported that no further
meetings had been held since Calgary. The next TC 13 meeting is
scheduled for 14 April 1996 in Vancouver, Canada. The current
membership is 20. Canada has recently nominated its
representative and the appointment is in progress. Three IFIP
member societies are expected to nominate representatives to TC
13.
INTERACT 97 will be held on 14-18 July 1997 in
Sydney, Australia and preparations are under way. The Call for
participation will be released in April 1996.
Finally, Mrs. Hammond stressed the
necessity for a stronger interaction between IFIP Technical
Committees.
Mr. Gruska informed Council that the next SG 14 Meeting would be held in Pennsylvania, USA in conjunction with the Federated Computer Science Conference, 20-26 March 1996. SG 14 has formed a panel to identify a new Chairperson. Working group's activities are developing steadily and SG 14 is considering establishing a new group in the field of Physical Foundations of Computations. Future plans include the organization of several meetings and events.
Mr. Ozeki referred to the Admissions
Committee Report and informed Council that the Azerbaijian
Academy of Sciences has shown interest in joining IFIP as Full
Member. INFORMS (Institute for Operational Research and the
Management Sciences) intends to apply for IFIP Affiliate
Membership. Information concerning application procedures were
provided to these organizations.
The President advised that during GA 96
the issue of having more than one member society per country
should be considered. Mr. Bauknecht recommended that a
list of potential IFIP members should be developed and requested
TC Chairs to identify countries which are represented in working
groups, but are not yet IFIP members, so as to encourage them to
apply for IFIP membership.
In response to a query from Mr.
Rosenfeld concerning the CEE and FSU status of membership,
Messrs. Nedkov and Johnson shared with Council that these
countries face serious financial problems which relate not only
to payment of membership dues, but also to participation in
meetings and events. Mr. Rolstadås advised that UNESCO
could be consulted so as to assist dues payments and travel
support. Mr. Johnson recommended the President to consider
some financial support for Council 97 in Bratislava in order to
provide partial travel support for Eastern European non-Members
to attend.
Mr. Guy reported that Beijing was chosen
for the site of WCC 2000 and a letter was sent to China for
confirmation of visas to all Congress participants. He is
confident that such a confirmation would be provided. The
Congress guidelines are being revised and would be sent out along
with the letter of invitation for WCC 2002 bids.
Mr. Ozeki addressed Council on behalf of
IPSJ and regretted the fact that China and Japan could not make a
joint proposal for Congress 2000. Nonetheless, IPSJ is confident
that Congress 2000 hosted by China would be truly innovative and
would contribute to the future development of IFIP. Japan is
willing to contribute to its successful organization and to the
possibility to play host to future IFIP events.
Mr. Fairall informed Council that the
DCSC Chair, Mr. Gottlieb had requested him to convene the DCSC
meeting which was attended by Messrs. Nedkov, Reis and Rosenfeld,
Mrs. Hammond and Mrs. Glenn. He drew attention to the DC e-mail
project and stressed that a questionnaire should be sent out to
IFIP members from developing countries, according to the UN
classification, as follows:
1. Does your Society have e-mail?
2. How extensive is coverage to your members?
3. Is cost high?
Since DCSC funds are rather limited, financial
assistance for WCC 96 participants will be limited to delegates
from DC member societies with preference for accepted papers.
Ideally, DCSC money should be used as matching funds to that of
local societies. A regional spread has to be kept in mind and
waiving or reducing Congress registration fees for DCSC supported
delegates needs to be negotiated with the Congress organizers.
Mr. Fairall noted with concern
that the DCSC budget for 1996 is only CHF 10,000 and, if
justified, the DCSC Chair could resort to the IFIP development
fund. UNESCO and EU may provide additional support and societies
should be encouraged to approach local or regional UNESCO offices
for assistance.
A limited number of new IFIP books with Chapman
& Hall are available for complimentary distribution to DC and
DCSC intends to circulate information about who may request
copies with the provision that they pay postage on a "first
come first served" basis.
In May 96, a G7 meeting would convene in South
Africa, accompanied by an exhibition featuring assistance in the
field of IT education for DCs. Mr. Fairall advised that
arrangements should be attempted in order to have IFIP
represented along with the CSSA exhibit.
Mr. Rosenfeld pointed out that most DCSC
members have access to e-mail and should work more actively
between meetings. If IFIP wishes to promote activities in
developing countries, the DCSC has to be more interactive. Mr.
Fairall recalled that a short gap was inevitable as,
following Calgary, there was a change of DCSC chairmanship and
Mr. Gottlieb has not served before as a member of DCSC.
Mr. Khakhar drew attention to his report
and recalled that the outcome of 1995 is a surplus of CHF 159,565
which compensates for the deficit experienced during the last
three years and re-establishes IFIP funds above the peak level of
1991. The IFIP auditors have examined the 1995 books and have
concluded that the accounts and the financial statements are in
accordance with the law and the requirements of the statutes. FC
moved that Council accepts the 1995 result for final approval by
GA 96.
Motion unanimously Carried.
As guidelines for preparing the 1997 budget, FC moved that Council accepts the following:
Messrs. Funk and Johnson expressed their
understanding that an inflation index is envisaged and dues
should be inflation adjusted. Mr. Guy pointed that, in
addition to inflation, some countries suffer from deteriorating
exchange rates. The President stressed that, once
inflation is accounted for, dues should not be raised if there is
no added value to IFIP services.
Motion unanimously Carried.
Mr. Khakhar informed Council that FC
reviewed the accounting procedures. Book keeping should be done
by the Secretariat which should produce regular reports to
Treasurer. In case of problems with recording, the Secretariat
should consult with the Auditor and Treasurer. Assessment of IFIP
finances and reports to the GA are done by Treasurer.
Mr. Melbye reported that as Treasurer he
was heavily involved in recording income and expenditures as the
new accounting system was introduced at the Secretariat in
January. The Secretariat has not received sufficient training in
using the new system. Once the training period is over and the
Treasurer and Auditor agree on the Chart of Accounts, contacts
with the Auditor on operational issues should decrease. The
Treasurer's responsibility would be greatly focused on preparing
reports and deciding on main issues.
Mr. Nedkov referred to his report and informed that the IFIP-UNESCO Liaison Officer represented IFIP at the General Conference of UNESCO, Commission IV- Information, Communication and Informatics, 9-11 November 1995, Paris. DR. 5 prepared by IFIP, submitted by Bulgaria and supported by Australia, Austria, India, New Zealand and Zimbabwe, was well received by the Commission and reassurances were made that WCC 96 would be supported by UNESCO. Consultations were made on issues relating to IFIP-UNESCO activities. GA members were informed by e-mail and advised on the procedure to apply for UNESCO sponsorship for IFIP related activities.
The IFIP-UNESCO Liaison Officer was
pleased to note that there is a favorable development in the
contacts with UNESCO and IFIP TCs express a growing interest to
contribute. Joint initiatives include the 3rd UNEVOC
Meeting, October 95, Paris, the Electronic Publishing Conference,
19 - 23 February 96, Paris, the International Conference on
Information Technology: Supporting Change through Teacher
Education, Kiryat Anavim, Israel, 30 June - 5 July 1996, the
Second International Congress "Education and
Informatics", 1-5 July 1996, Moscow, Russian Federation, the
translation into several languages of the TC 3 "Informatics
for Secondary Education: A Curriculum for Schools" and
others.
The 149th session of UNESCO's
Executive Board would examine UNESCO's relations with NGOs.
Requested additional information on IFIP and its activities was
prepared and sent.
The Commission of the European Communities has
promised support to Congress 96 participants from Central and
Eastern Europe.
The President expressed his
appreciation of the work and advised that he intends to take part
in the International Conference on Education and Informatics in
Moscow.
Mr. Morris advised that a discussion
paper would be prepared for GA so as to consider possible changes
in the conditions governing the Silver Core Award. He invited TC
Chairs to contribute to this work and to consider names to be
submitted to GA by the Internal Awards Committee for the
Outstanding Service Award.
With regard to Mr. Gruska's comment that a
justification should accompany a nomination for the Silver Core, Mr.
Morris responded that this is not necessary as the
requirements are quite specifically defined categories.
Mrs. Glenn referred to her report and
said that prior to the MC meeting, a document, outlining IFIP and
its services, was circulated. This document was the basis for
discussion which indicated that we need to re-position IFIP as
the international IT organization dealing with IT matters
globally and locally. IFIP's strengths, weaknesses, its
opportunities and threats were identified.
In focusing on the future, it was recognized
that IFIP volunteers are not professional marketers and that a
market consultant was needed to develop a market strategy plan so
as to identify the value that IFIP could have for its member
societies, TCs, IT organizations, industry, supporters,
governments, international organizations, IT professionals and
IFIP volunteers. This strategy should provide a marketing
structure to specifically address the different constituents, and
support the re-positioning of IFIP. With this in mind, Mrs.
Glenn proposed that IFIP hires a marketing communications
consultant.
The President pointed out that hiring a
Consultant would involve a lot of money and at the same time his
work could contribute to IFIP's visibility. He queried whether an
IFIP volunteer could be engaged rather than to engage an outside
person. Mr. Goldsworthy stressed the importance of
developing a brief for the consultant before further actions are
taken.
Messrs. Hoerbst, Grafendorfer and
Navez held the opinion that a main task of a Consultant would
be to provide the methodology, not the content. His activity
should be targeted to display the "story line" and this
would be beneficial to IFIP member societies. Mr. Rolstadås
also considered that the methodology is quite important in
developing a market strategy as, from his experience, member
societies express views on weaknesses but it is not always easy
to identify future opportunities.
Messrs. Morris, Nedkov and Melbye held
the opinion that IFIP's primary market place is its members. IFIP
should address such questions as: Are we doing enough to
communicate with our Members? How might we do it better? What do
our Members expect from us? Mr. Melbye recalled that IFIP
should realize its capabilities as it is an organization of
volunteers and not a commercial enterprise. IFIP's Members
between themselves are a very heterogeneous market.
Mr. Tienari found it difficult to
consider IFIP in terms of products and markets. It would be wise
if the IFIP services are viewed from the perspective of IFIP
Members. Mr. Rosenfeld expressed an opinion that a person
from a member society could be engaged with the development of a
market strategy.
The President thanked everyone for the
debate and confirmed that he will consult with member societies
inviting suggestions about how IFIP could improve its services to
its Members. EB would consider the possibility of hiring a
Consultant and, in the meantime, he encouraged MC to develop an
IFIP marketing plan for consideration by GA and to work via
e-mail interactively.
Mr. Rosenfeld reported that everything
is going well with the Newsletter. There are no changes in the
layout. Articles and information are received from TCs. There is
a synopsis on member societies. In the past, copies of the
Newsletter were sent to Conference organizers and IFIP should
consider resuming this practice.
Mr. Johnson referred to his
report and said that the PC is pleased with the sales of IFIP
publications with Chapman & Hall. 38 books and 1 CD-ROM were
published in 1995. Total revenue for the IFIP publications,
including the 4 titles published in 1994, for the year ending 31
December 1995 was GBP 332.028. Gross royalties payable for 1995
total GBP 59.220. Back sales are proving better than expected.
The PC Chair holds regular meetings with Chapman & Hall and
this has improved communications on a range of issues. Marketing
has steadily improved and the Publisher is building an "IFIP
Resource Centre", as demonstrated in Sandton. The
introduction of a standard tariff for IFIP publications is
intended to ensure that all TCs receive equal treatment and the
rules and procedures are transparent. Vice-President Funk has
prepared an analysis of citations of IFIP publications showing
disappointing levels of citations and PC is considering how to
increase visibility. The IFIP Secretariat has established a list
server of member society newsletter editors and this should help
publicize IFIP books and IFIP events. PC members communicate
intensively via e-mail.
Mr. Funk commended the PC Chair's
management style and referred to the PC as a model for the work
of IFIP committees. He informed that the papers from the
ICSU/UNESCO Electronic Publishing Conference would be available
on-line and he would communicate the site shortly.
Referring to virtual conferences, Mr.
Johnson considered two aspects as important - e-mail
exchange and recording. The organization of such conferences
would be investigated by PC.
The President said he is very pleased to have an active Publications Committee.
Statutes and BylawsMr. Morris presented the report on
behalf of the SBC Chairman, Mr. Bobillier and informed that it
addresses subjects raised after the Calgary GA meeting. Advice is
requested for the preparation of the SBC report to GA with regard
to the following draft proposals:
Disposal of assets in case of dissolution:
add at the end of Art 7 (p.11): "The assets will be
transferred to one or more non-profit organizations with aims
similar to those of IFIP"
Secretary and Treasurer elect: Art 3.4,
paragraph 1 (p.21): Replace the last sentence by: "The
Secretary-elect and the Treasurer-elect shall be elected one year
before taking their office to allow a smooth transition".
Cognizant person: To avoid the ambiguity
of the current "Cognizant Trustee" replace everywhere
"Cognizant Trustee" by "Cognizant Council
Member"
(this issue was addressed under item 3.11)
Art 3.3 (p 20-21): Replace "Full
Members" by "Full or ex-officio Members". As
ex-officio members can vote, they should also be able to
nominate.
Art 3.4 (p 21): Replace paragraph 2 by:
"The election procedure is described in the Standing Order
Supplement 8".
Mr. Morris requested Council's position
on the following:
Proxies: The SBL/Standing Orders do not
limit the number of proxies a GA member can carry. It is
suggested to limit to 3 this number, thus allowing any GA Member
to have a maximum of 4 votes.
Messrs. Funk, Goldsworthy, Rolstadås and
Bauknecht stressed that last moment arrangements would be
difficult if this rule is adopted by GA and it is the right of
every GA member to give his/her proxy to whoever he/she prefers.
The majority of Council members Concurred
that the number of proxies a GA member can carry should not be
restricted.
Robert's rules of order: Drop Art 3.6
Conduct of Meetings.
Mr. Funk suggested that the Robert's
rules of order are maintained. Mr. Morris recalled that
every time IFIP referred to these rules, they were either
irrelevant or incomprehensible. There was, however, a general
feeling that unless a better alternative can be found we should
retain Robert's since, without it, we would have no basic rules
for the conduct of our meetings.
Mail ballot: Article 4.3.2 (p 10): Add
to the sentence of para. 3: "Members eligible to vote will
be provided with adequate background information via mail, fax or
e-mail, as appropriate, all of which will be acceptable media for
returning votes".
Messrs. Johnson and Goldsworthy and Mrs.
Hammond supported the suggestion to allow e-mail voting,
stressing the importance that voting lists should be provided
following the vote and that voting is organized subject to
appropriate security procedures. Mr. Morris informed that
EB holds the opinion that in open voting details of the votes
cost should be given while in the case of closed votes only a
list of who voted should be provided.
Council Agreed.
Mr. Zemanek reported on the preparations
of the publication "35 Years of IFIP". The situation
has improved thanks to the initiative of Mr. Rolstadås.
The structure of the publication was reshaped and would cover the
following major areas: IFIP in a changing world, professional
activities and operations, publications, TCs, member societies,
IFIP Secretariat, an extended Silver Summary and other.
Mr. Zemanek advised that the deadline
for contributions is set for 15 May 1996 and that papers should
be submitted in ASCII or Word 6.0 format.
Materials from CEPIS and the VLDB Endowment,
Inc. were distributed to Council.
Mr. Morris announced that EB would meet
on 4 September (Wednesday), 1996 in Canberra. The GA 96 series of
meetings are scheduled to begin on 6 September (Friday) after
lunch and will end on 10 September (Tuesday) at noon. The meeting
of the Task Force on Harmonization of Standards for IT
Professional will convene on 5 September (Thursday). The
Presidents' Luncheon will be organized on 4 September.
C 97 is scheduled for 3-6 March in Bratislava,
Slovakia. EB would meet on 2 March.
At least two member societies are interested in
hosting GA 97 and formal invitations are expected for decision by
GA. There are no signs of invitations for Council meetings from
1998 onwards.
Mr. Goldsworthy proposed that IFIP
should consider financial support for the organization of Council
and General Assembly meetings in developing countries. Mr.
Rolstadås concurred that IFIP should aim to adopt such a
support scheme.
Council requested the President to decide which
members to approach.
Mrs. Carlucci-Aiello informed Council
that she would investigate the possibility of hosting an IFIP
Council or GA meeting in Italy, possibly in conjunction with
lectures or seminars by IFIP participants aimed at raising funds.
The President once again expressed
IFIP's gratitude to CSSA and Mr. Guy for the excellent
organization and cordial hospitality. He thanked the Council
participants for their contributions and declared the Council 96
Meeting closed.